{"id":31009,"date":"2022-06-01T16:55:43","date_gmt":"2022-06-01T16:55:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/"},"modified":"2023-04-02T12:54:22","modified_gmt":"2023-04-02T12:54:22","slug":"o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira","status":"publish","type":"opinions","link":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/","title":{"rendered":"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"31009\" class=\"elementor elementor-31009 elementor-19505\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-51c188fd elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"51c188fd\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-3d8af358\" data-id=\"3d8af358\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7f63b85 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"7f63b85\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.12.1 - 02-04-2023 *\/\n.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#69727d;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#69727d;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t<p>Autor: <a href=\"#elementor-action%3Aaction%3Dpopup%3Aopen%26settings%3DeyJpZCI6MTI5ODcsInRvZ2dsZSI6ZmFsc2V9\">Filipe Carvalho<\/a>, Associado<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-480e3b56 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"480e3b56\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00c9 uma regra da lei brasileira que geralmente quem quer que alegue tem de provar a alega\u00e7\u00e3o. Nos termos do artigo 373\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil Brasileiro<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>, o \u00f3nus da prova cabe ao requerente, para provar os factos constitutivos do seu caso (item I) e sobre o requerido, para provar factos que prejudiquem, modifiquem ou extingam o direito do requerente (item II).<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Portanto, cada vez que a parte apresenta um processo, deve indicar<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> e reunir<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a> na sua declara\u00e7\u00e3o de reclama\u00e7\u00e3o toda a documenta\u00e7\u00e3o que prove as suas alega\u00e7\u00f5es.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Contudo, h\u00e1 situa\u00e7\u00f5es em que esta regra do \u00f3nus da prova n\u00e3o pode ser aplicada, citando como exemplo, em que um requerente n\u00e3o tem a prova para cumprir este dever ou porque \u00e9 mais f\u00e1cil obter a prova do facto contr\u00e1rio.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Neste sentido, o C\u00f3digo de Processo Brasileiro<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a> autoriza o juiz a atribuir o \u00f3nus da prova de forma diferente, desde que o fa\u00e7a por decis\u00e3o fundamentada, e o juiz deve tamb\u00e9m dar \u00e0 parte a oportunidade de exonerar o \u00f3nus que lhe foi atribu\u00eddo.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Vale a pena mencionar que o C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil Brasileiro (Lei Federal n.\u00ba 13,105\/2015) tamb\u00e9m confere \u00e0s partes o direito de definir, antes ou durante o processo, a distribui\u00e7\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a>. Esta regra n\u00e3o se aplica, contudo, se tiver impacto nos direitos inalien\u00e1veis de uma parte (um que n\u00e3o pode ser dado ou retirado) ou quando torna excessivamente dif\u00edcil para uma parte exercer esse direito.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Em 2018, o Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a (STJ), um \u00f3rg\u00e3o colectivo do Poder Judici\u00e1rio brasileiro, editou a S\u00famula n. 618 que tem a seguinte redac\u00e7\u00e3o: &#8220;A invers\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova aplica-se ao processo de degrada\u00e7\u00e3o ambiental&#8221;.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">A invers\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova em mat\u00e9ria ambiental pode ser justificada pela aplica\u00e7\u00e3o do princ\u00edpio da precau\u00e7\u00e3o, no princ\u00edpio 15 da Confer\u00eancia das Na\u00e7\u00f5es Unidas sobre Ambiente e Desenvolvimento (UNCED 1992), que estabelece que \u201c<em>A fim de proteger o ambiente, o princ\u00edpio da precau\u00e7\u00e3o deve ser amplamente observado pelos Estados, de acordo com as suas capacidades. Quando existe uma amea\u00e7a de danos graves ou irrevers\u00edveis, a falta de certeza cient\u00edfica total n\u00e3o deve ser utilizada como motivo para adiar medidas eficazes e rent\u00e1veis para prevenir a degrada\u00e7\u00e3o ambiental<\/em><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a>.\u201d<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Em palavras simples, se houver qualquer suspeita de que uma actividade possa causar danos ambientais, o ambiente deve ter o benef\u00edcio da d\u00favida.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">N\u00e3o surpreendentemente, o STJ, ao pronunciar-se sobre um caso ambiental<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\">[7]<\/a>, estabeleceu o entendimento de que &#8220;o princ\u00edpio da precau\u00e7\u00e3o (&#8230;) pressup\u00f5e a invers\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova, transferindo para o concession\u00e1rio o \u00f3nus da prova de que a sua conduta n\u00e3o deu origem a riscos para o ambiente (&#8230;)&#8221;.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">De facto, o mesmo entendimento foi novamente avan\u00e7ado pelo STJ<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftn8\" name=\"_ftnref8\">[8]<\/a>. Ver: &#8220;o princ\u00edpio da precau\u00e7\u00e3o pressup\u00f5e a invers\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova, e cabe \u00e0queles que alegadamente causaram o dano ambiental provar que n\u00e3o o causaram ou que a subst\u00e2ncia libertada para o ambiente n\u00e3o \u00e9 potencialmente nociva&#8221;.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <p>\n            <span style=\"color: #000000;\">Conclui-se, portanto, que a exist\u00eancia destas regras, apoiadas por uma s\u00f3lida jurisprud\u00eancia, est\u00e1 centrada em evitar que as actividades das grandes empresas poluidoras fiquem impunes, trazendo \u00e0 parte (muitas vezes desprivilegiada) uma paridade efectiva de armas e um meio equilibrado de fundamentar as reivindica\u00e7\u00f5es, quer por si mesmas, quer recorrendo \u00e0 invers\u00e3o do \u00f3nus da prova.<\/span>\n          <\/p>\n          <pre><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">References<\/span>\n\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Art. 373. The burden of proof is assigned to:<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">I \u2013 the plaintiff, as to the fact constituting his or her right;<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">II \u2013 the defendant, as to the existence of a fact that impedes, modifies or extinguishes the plaintiff\u2019s right.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Art. 319. The complaint shall inform:<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">VI \u2013 the evidence with which the plaintiff intends to prove the truth of the alleged facts;<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Art. 320. The complaint shall produce the documents that are indispensable for the filing of the action.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Art. 373, \u00a71\u00ba: In the cases provided for by law, or in view of the peculiarities of the action relative to the impossibility or excessive difficulty of performing the duty pursuant to the head provision, or even the greater ease of obtaining evidence to the contrary, the judge may assign the burden of proof differently, provided this is done in a reasoned decision, in which case the party must be given the opportunity to carry out the assigned charge.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Art. 373, \u00a7 3\u00ba: A different assignment of the burden of proof may also occur by agreement of the parties, unless:<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">I \u2013 it impacts on an inalienable right of the party;<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">II \u2013 it renders the exercise of the right by one of the parties excessively difficult.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\">Art. 373, \u00a7 4\u00ba: 4 The agreement referred to in \u00a7 3 may be executed before or during the proceedings.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> It is worth noting that the precautionary principle has its origins in the \u201cWorld Charter for Nature\u201d, of 1982, whose principle n. 11, \u201cb\u201d, established the need for States to control activities potentially harmful to the environment, even if their effects were not fully known.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref7\" name=\"_ftn7\">[7]<\/a> STJ, AgInt in the Interlocutory Appeal in Special Appeal n. 1311669 \u2013 SC, Judge Rapporteur Ricardo Villas B\u00f4as Cueva, judged on 03 December 2018.<\/span>\n<span style=\"font-size: 8pt;\"><a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"#_ftnref8\" name=\"_ftn8\">[8]<\/a> STJ, REsp 1.060.753\/SP, Judge Rapporteur Eliana Calmon, judged on 01 December 2009.<\/span><\/span><\/pre>\n        \t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Autor: Filipe Carvalho, Associado \u00c9 uma regra da lei brasileira que geralmente quem quer que alegue tem de provar a alega\u00e7\u00e3o. Nos termos do artigo 373\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil Brasileiro[1], o \u00f3nus da prova cabe ao requerente, para provar os factos constitutivos do seu caso (item I) e sobre o requerido, para provar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":26363,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_expiration-date-status":"","_expiration-date":0,"_expiration-date-type":"","_expiration-date-categories":[],"_expiration-date-options":[]},"opinionscategories":[356],"class_list":["post-31009","opinions","type-opinions","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","opinionscategories-environmental-and-international-law-pt-br"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v20.4 (Yoast SEO v20.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira - POGUST GOODHEAD<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_BR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Autor: Filipe Carvalho, Associado \u00c9 uma regra da lei brasileira que geralmente quem quer que alegue tem de provar a alega\u00e7\u00e3o. Nos termos do artigo 373\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil Brasileiro[1], o \u00f3nus da prova cabe ao requerente, para provar os factos constitutivos do seu caso (item I) e sobre o requerido, para provar [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"POGUST GOODHEAD\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-04-02T12:54:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/defaultfeaturedimage.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"507\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. tempo de leitura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/\",\"name\":\"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira - POGUST GOODHEAD\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-01T16:55:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-04-02T12:54:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/\",\"name\":\"POGUST GOODHEAD\",\"description\":\"Making History, Together\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#organization\",\"name\":\"POGUST GOODHEAD\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/cropped-pogustgoodheadlogobw.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/cropped-pogustgoodheadlogobw.png\",\"width\":326,\"height\":150,\"caption\":\"POGUST GOODHEAD\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira - POGUST GOODHEAD","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"pt_BR","og_type":"article","og_title":"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira","og_description":"Autor: Filipe Carvalho, Associado \u00c9 uma regra da lei brasileira que geralmente quem quer que alegue tem de provar a alega\u00e7\u00e3o. Nos termos do artigo 373\u00ba do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil Brasileiro[1], o \u00f3nus da prova cabe ao requerente, para provar os factos constitutivos do seu caso (item I) e sobre o requerido, para provar [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/","og_site_name":"POGUST GOODHEAD","article_modified_time":"2023-04-02T12:54:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":507,"url":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/defaultfeaturedimage.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. tempo de leitura":"4 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/","url":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/","name":"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira - POGUST GOODHEAD","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-06-01T16:55:43+00:00","dateModified":"2023-04-02T12:54:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-BR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/opinions\/o-onus-da-prova-nos-casos-ambientais-ao-abrigo-da-legislacao-brasileira\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"O \u00f3nus da prova nos casos ambientais ao abrigo da legisla\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/","name":"POGUST GOODHEAD","description":"Making History, Together","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#organization","name":"POGUST GOODHEAD","url":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/cropped-pogustgoodheadlogobw.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/cropped-pogustgoodheadlogobw.png","width":326,"height":150,"caption":"POGUST GOODHEAD"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/opinions\/31009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/opinions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/opinions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/opinions\/31009\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"opinionscategories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wdev.pogustgoodhead.com\/pt-br\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/opinionscategories?post=31009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}